Today's hottest deals

MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive422% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B09
MotherboardMSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)  (all builds)
Memory53.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '19 at 22:39
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$334
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 70.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 233
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 899
79% 674 Pts
64-Core 2,310
143% 2,310 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200
Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31% Below average
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 40.4
Parallax 53.2
30% 43.6 fps
MRender 52.1
Gravity 43.6
Splatting 28.1
32% 41.3 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 4 1.5TB
508GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3446 3630 3323 3212 3777 3453 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
422% Outstanding
Read 3,331
Write 3302
Mixed 1,299
SusWrite 3,474
641% 2,852 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 47.9
150% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 628
DQ Write 685
DQ Mixed 650
491% 654 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 422%
Great: 422%
Amd-raid WDC WD10EARS-00Z 1TB
742GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 70 72 75 75 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.3% Average
Read 78.8
Write 59.3
Mixed 39
SusWrite 71.9
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.07 MB/s
Amd-raid WDC WD6400AAKS-0 640GB
216GB free
Firmware: 07.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 77 81 81 83 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 77.7
Write 84.8
Mixed 46
SusWrite 81
53% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU64GX4M4C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
174% Outstanding
MC Read 70.9
MC Write 70.2
MC Mixed 68.7
200% 69.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 28.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 174%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $655
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback