Today's hottest deals

EVGA Z390 FTW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardEVGA Z390 FTW  (all builds)
Memory42.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190917
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 27 '19 at 14:58
Run Duration450 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 146
2-Core 295
97% 178 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 844
82% 671 Pts
64-Core 1,050
65% 1,050 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 18.6
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 25.8
20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 995 969 944 1075 1114 1097 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,954
Write 1,859
Mixed 1,392
SusWrite 1,032
350% 1,560 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 66.5
210% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 990
DQ Write 883
DQ Mixed 985
725% 952 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 249%
Great: 372%
SSD 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 368 285 82 90 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 364
Write 249
Mixed 293
SusWrite 212
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 29.8
104% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 199
176% 263 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 98%
SSD 480GB
283GB free
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 29 7.2 6.2 6.6 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
31% Below average
Read 345
Write 148
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 18
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 8.3
51% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 47
DQ Write 9.4
DQ Mixed 13.8
14% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 31%
Great: 98%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
352GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,190
Write 7,290
Mixed 7,052
1,605% 7,177 MB/s
4K Read 653
4K Write 260
4K Mixed 354
1,581% 422 MB/s
DQ Read 1,636
DQ Write 842
DQ Mixed 1,009
811% 1,162 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 131%
Toshiba MD04ACA500 5TB-$154
1TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 104 107 110 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 163
Write 112
Mixed 35
SusWrite 104
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 110%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 81 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 68
Write 77.2
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 83.3
48% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 109%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$140
1TB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 107 107 110 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 164
Write 146
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 104
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 99%
Marvell Raid VD 12TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 225 252 254 253 256 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 102
Write 157
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 242
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
226% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 273%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$113
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 137 126 117 139 146 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
6TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 98 93 87 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 176
Write 189
Mixed 110
SusWrite 94.3
187% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.8
203% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 86%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB
5.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 100 103 97 90 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 159
Write 186
Mixed 129
SusWrite 99
193% 143 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 1
291% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 99%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
2TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 125 127 131 116 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 114
Write 99.5
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 127
142% 105 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 86%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB
4.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 198 205 192 176 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 202
Mixed 111
SusWrite 196
234% 172 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 0.9
280% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 99%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 12TB
2.5TB free, PID 0a10
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 179 195 185 163 186 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 178
Write 102
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 181
161% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
31% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 108%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 16TB
5TB free, PID 0a10
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 225 238 236 224 236 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 186
Write 168
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 231
213% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.9
62% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 108%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
826GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 151 172 155 142 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 162
Write 133
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 160
178% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.2
112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 98%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
1TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 88 92 87 82 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 135
Write 148
Mixed 94.5
SusWrite 88.2
155% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
214% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 98%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
947GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 166 169 161 148 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 136
Write 116
Mixed 93
SusWrite 162
172% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
214% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 86%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 150 152 149 145 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 160
Write 167
Mixed 107
SusWrite 152
198% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 86%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB
1TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 123 127 124 115 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 151
Write 164
Mixed 121
SusWrite 125
190% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 99%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB
2.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 97 100 94 89 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 166
Write 164
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 96.3
169% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$105
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 32.2
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 24.8
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 FTW Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 202%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO

Motherboard: EVGA Z390 FTW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $1,853
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback