Today's hottest deals

Asus M4A89GTD-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101022
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 06 '16 at 11:11
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
AM3, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 5 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 83.4
1-Core 47
2-Core 90.4
49% 73.6 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 206
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4192
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.11% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 2.54
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.44 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.54 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.11%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESA3SMF2HTGT120GB 120GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1027A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 428
Write 136
Mixed 208
56% 257 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 2.9
51% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 20
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 10.8
27% 53.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 57%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$99
113GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 88.6
Mixed 93.2
70% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.3
80% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 54%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
5GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 57.1
Write 52.3
Mixed 49.8
40% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.18
66% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9D7TBOZE-TATP 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
8192, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.7% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.8
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback