Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive16.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '19 at 04:14
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 85.5
46% 71.1 Pts
4-Core 86.8
8-Core 86.4
12% 86.6 Pts
64-Core 84.2
5% 84.2 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Zotac(19DA 1352) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 22.4
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 21.1
18% 20 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 17.1
17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 80GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 35 34 50 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 81
Write 58.8
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 38.4
14% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 10.6
33% 9.9 MB/s
DQ Read 5.1
DQ Write 7.6
DQ Mixed 9.4
6% 7.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 23%
Virtual Disk 537GB
131GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 37 40 36 51 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.7% Very poor
Read 80.5
Write 58.5
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 42.2
14% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 10.6
33% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 8.6
DQ Write 9.1
DQ Mixed 10.4
7% 9.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773SB0-CK0 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.2% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 10.5
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 10.1
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback