Today's hottest deals

Asrock 990FX Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 23:15
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 111
59% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 426
41% 339 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.5% Average
Lighting 57.9
Reflection 71.5
Parallax 88.3
47% 72.6 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 58.3
54% 67 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$58
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 404
Write 341
Mixed 239
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 33.7
119% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 188
145% 198 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 133
95% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
39% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion Desk 256GB
102GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 137 134 137 136 137 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
163% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 133
Mixed 124
SusWrite 134
185% 139 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 23.1
2,027% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 49
DQ Mixed 27.4
2,685% 33.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 163%
Great: 163%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-062.A00LF Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 9905474-062.A00LF Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Extreme4 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme4 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $476
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback