Today's hottest deals

Asus P7P55D-E EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E EVO  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111020
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateMay 11 '19 at 14:52
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 K 875-$174
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 160
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 379
40% 318 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.9% Average
Lighting 59.9
Reflection 65.2
Parallax 63.1
49% 62.7 fps
MRender 69.5
Gravity 57.8
Splatting 55
49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 256GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 22 22 22 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 519
Write 50.7
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 22.6
35% 165 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 9.8
46% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 13.7
DQ Mixed 29.3
39% 76.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 199%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
196GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 118 131 131 132 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 118
Write 115
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 128
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.2
213% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
39.2% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.4
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E EVO Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $552
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback