Today's hottest deals

IBM Node 1, System Card

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIBM Node 1, System Card  (all builds)
Memory48.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140723
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateApr 12 '19 at 20:58
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E7- 2870
Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 120
55% 88 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 484
42% 359 Pts
64-Core 1,572
97% 1,572 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 599GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 90 86 83 87 87 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
107% Outstanding
Read 1,404
Write 808
Mixed 1,586
SusWrite 88.2
217% 972 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 34.4
115% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 218
166% 223 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 107%
Great: 150%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 599GB
165GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 70 71 71 71 75 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
109% Outstanding
Read 1,465
Write 514
Mixed 1,538
SusWrite 72.3
199% 897 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 33.3
115% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 217
166% 223 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 109%
Great: 150%
WD A DT01A External 1TB
604GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 23 24 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 27.8
Write 22.3
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 23.4
33% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC72C4PG0NL-CG 16x4GB
16 of 32 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.3% Above average
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 20.5
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback