ADD TO PC
BUILD

Kontron KBOX-C102

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Kontron KBOX-C102 (all builds)
Motherboard	Kontron COMe-bSL6
Memory	29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190321
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '19 at 15:16
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6820EQ 146 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 109 2-Core 188 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 191 34% 236 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) 213,495 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4944 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	2.68% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 4.19 Parallax 3.22 2% 3.34 fps	MRender 4.71 Gravity 2.93 Splatting 5.74 4% 4.46 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.68% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ128GCSY 128GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: JYGA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 379 383 369 111 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Read 425 Write 371 Mixed 369 SusWrite 280 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 22.7 71% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 286 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 330 236% 301 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 104%
SFSA060GU2AA2TO-I-LB-216-STD 60GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 56GB free Firmware: SBR11015 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 89 89 89 89 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.8% Above average	Read 429 Write 89.7 Mixed 141 SusWrite 88.8 41% 187 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 21.5 74% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 89.3 DQ Mixed 108 90% 132 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 72%
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33 20,095 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 226GB free Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 260 263 259 262 262 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 1,138 Write 292 Mixed 926 SusWrite 298 147% 663 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 44.1 4K Mixed 35 109% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 640 DQ Write 443 DQ Mixed 539 403% 541 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 244%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown D4SO2G644G-A18SB 2x16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.5% Good	MC Read 23.3 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 23.3 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 19.2 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback