Kontron KBOX-C102

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemKontron KBOX-C102  (all builds)
MotherboardKontron COMe-bSL6
Memory30.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '19 at 18:55
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820EQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 111
2-Core 215
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 559
61% 483 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4944
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.44% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 9.35
Parallax 6.81
5% 7.59 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 6.13
Splatting 13.7
8% 9.94 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.44%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ128GCSY 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYGA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 405 403 371 371 377 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 418
Write 376
Mixed 373
SusWrite 387
88% 388 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 22.3
69% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 288
210% 272 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 104%
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
226GB free
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 257 263 260 262 262 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1533
Write 1,014
Mixed 927
SusWrite 294
209% 942 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 36.4
115% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 829
DQ Write 933
DQ Mixed 642
549% 801 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 154%
Great: 244%
SFSA060GU2AA2TO-I-LB-216-STD 60GB
56GB free
Firmware: SBR11015
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 89 89 89 89 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.4% Above average
Read 420
Write 89.4
Mixed 141
SusWrite 88.7
40% 185 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 21.6
74% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 89.3
DQ Mixed 108
89% 131 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4SO2G644G-A18SB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.6
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback