Today's hottest deals

Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 06 '19 at 05:09
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 182
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 542
49% 414 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1160 MHz, MLim: 2020 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver:
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.7% Above average
Lighting 64.2
Reflection 60.4
Parallax 77.8
52% 67.5 fps
MRender 60.9
Gravity 63.7
Splatting 52.1
48% 58.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 512GB
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KFS10010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 414 423 431 433 432 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 434
Mixed 319
SusWrite 416
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 36.8
125% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 206
177% 260 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 187%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
624GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 93 91 92 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 104
Write 122
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 92
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 68%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$21
375GB free
Firmware: SM16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 88 88 87 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 72.3
Write 61.8
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 87.6
44% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.6
326% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 64%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
1TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37.2
Write 23
Mixed 21.5
32% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
54% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 59%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
812GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.25% Terrible
Read 12.8
Write 32
Mixed 23
SusWrite 0
24% 17 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
26% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 43%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
1TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 30.5
Write 27.7
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 28.8
36% 27 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.5
140% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 53%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 27.8
Write 31.3
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 3.5
29% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
122% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 31.1
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 23.9
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 9,258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $102

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $417
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback