Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z68-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V LX  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '19 at 15:25
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 89
1-Core 107
2-Core 211
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 509
53% 427 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Asus(1043 83B9) 1GB
CLim: 594 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
6.05% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 8.38
Parallax 5.81
6% 7.13 fps
MRender 7.71
Gravity 7.47
Splatting 8.17
6% 7.78 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.05%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$77
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 234 230 238 236 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
76.9% Very good
Read 255
Write 243
Mixed 243
SusWrite 234
55% 243 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 44.3
139% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 192
145% 193 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 129%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
57GB free
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 191 187 192 192 192 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 447
Write 190
Mixed 228
SusWrite 189
58% 264 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 9.6
53% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 11.7
DQ Mixed 14.8
26% 54.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 72%
Corsair Force 115GB-$71
8GB free
Firmware: 2.1a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 58 59 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 198
Write 67.4
Mixed 89.4
SusWrite 57.3
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 11.4
51% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 69
DQ Write 22.8
DQ Mixed 29.4
26% 40.4 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 50%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 135 122 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 82.5
Write 135
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 124
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
148GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 147 151 153 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 72.6
Write 129
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 150
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
180% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 90%
JMicron Generic DISK01 3TB
397GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0 0 3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 25.6
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 0.5
26% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 57%
JMicron Generic DISK02 2TB
269GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 24 25 23 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 27.8
Write 26
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 23.3
32% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
176% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 53%
JMicron Generic DISK00 2TB
255GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 25.5
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 0.1
24% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 75%
JMicron Generic DISK03 3TB
122GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 2.9 3.2 3.1 3 3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.43% Terrible
Read 31.8
Write 26.1
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 3
27% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 9.43%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V LX Builds (Compare 1,910 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback