Today's hottest deals

MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B92
MotherboardMSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)  (all builds)
Memory123.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '19 at 23:15
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2990WX-$790
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 55.1
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 188
61% 112 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 905
73% 639 Pts
64-Core 5,303
328% 5,303 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 89%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 818 623 621 617 613 606 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,965
Write 1,655
Mixed 658
SusWrite 650
274% 1,232 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 55.3
193% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 928
DQ Write 769
DQ Mixed 804
614% 834 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 216%
Great: 254%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3466 C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.6% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 24.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 25.6
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 159%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,633
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback