Today's hottest deals

HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180710
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 05 '18 at 13:13
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 122
56% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 572
49% 418 Pts
64-Core 1,781
110% 1,781 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 0969) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 411.31
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.6% Below average
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 35.6
Parallax 50.6
31% 41.3 fps
MRender 48.5
Gravity 44
Splatting 33
33% 41.8 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 409 398 293 295 295 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 362
Write 408
Mixed 393
SusWrite 351
86% 378 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 31.8
97% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 249
201% 284 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0-CMA 2x16GB
2 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.9% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.8
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback