Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive562% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GE
Memory16.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '18 at 04:07
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 148
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 411
41% 336 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 18FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.58% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 4.09
3% 12.8 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 7.3
5% 5.35 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.58%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
647GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA7100Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2132 1730 1719 1643 1625 1708 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
562% Outstanding
Read 4,968
Write 5,401
Mixed 6,035
SusWrite 1,759
1,022% 4,541 MB/s
4K Read 267
4K Write 226
4K Mixed 186
762% 226 MB/s
DQ Read 587
DQ Write 530
DQ Mixed 554
417% 557 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 562%
Great: 331%
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
461GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 44 46 50 58 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 3,548
Write 46.5
Mixed 92.7
SusWrite 47.6
194% 934 MB/s
4K Read 224
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 5.9
349% 77.6 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 132%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G3E1 859B CT16G4SFD8266.C16FD1 32GB
2400, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.6% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 22.2
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 19.9
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE Builds (Compare 1,554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback