Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 540 8,329 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Memory 63.7 1-Core 74.7 2-Core 126 52% 88.1 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 166 22% 167 Pts	64-Core 173 11% 173 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 172A) 2.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.3268 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.92% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 0.97 1% 1.03 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.74 1% 1.34 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.92% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 205 205 208 209 204 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.9% Above average	Read 217 Write 206 Mixed 204 SusWrite 206 47% 208 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 29.9 4K Mixed 23.5 77% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 26.2 60% 124 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 124%
INTEL SS DSC2BW180A3H 180GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 168GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.9% Poor	Read 27.5 Write 19.3 Mixed 22.4 SusWrite 22.7 30% 23 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 4.8 335% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	23.7% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 9.5 23% 8.07 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
NVS 3100MNvidiaBench 1%, 9,073 samples	293x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	22x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $98