Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory60 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '18 at 12:41
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 198
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 836
74% 627 Pts
64-Core 1,634
101% 1,634 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 123F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 177
Parallax 182
140% 177 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 183
Splatting 123
116% 144 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 126%
Great: 140%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BX800G4R 800GB
744GB free
Firmware: G201DL2B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 482
Mixed 503
111% 498 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 31
112% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 19.5
72% 162 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 109%
Intel SSDSC2BX800G4R 800GB
616GB free
Firmware: G201DL29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 505
Write 483
Mixed 469
108% 486 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 19.6
94% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 27.4
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 118
80% 92.9 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 109%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$150
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,955
Write 896
Mixed 1,098
289% 1,316 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 28.7
118% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 38.8
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 23.2
61% 121 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 176%
Great: 243%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43BB1-CRC 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB RIMM DDR4 1600 MHz clocked @ 1667 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 30.7
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 16.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $632
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $292WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback