Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-V  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110509
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateNov 21 '24 at 18:53
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$173
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 193
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 468
53% 416 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Gigabyte(1458 3527) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 15.5
13% 18.2 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 16.2
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 429 430 433 437 427 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 350
Mixed 334
SusWrite 430
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 30.5
114% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 288
236% 337 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60
346GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 101 101 102 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 98.1
Write 102
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 101
67% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.B1GDE.C7Z0C Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 78.B1GDE.C7Z0C Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 120 23" 1280 720 SAM085E S23A700
Typical P8H67-V Builds (Compare 412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback