Today's hottest deals

9te6epl3q6 9TE6EPL3Q6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 hrs ago, 4 hrs ago.
System9te6epl3q6 9TE6EPL3Q6  (all builds)
Motherboard9TE6EPL3Q6 9TE6EPL3Q6
Memory3.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210908
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 21 '24 at 15:52
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 185
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 461
52% 405 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.9.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.3% Average
Lighting 60.6
Reflection 61.5
Parallax 82
49% 68 fps
MRender 61.1
Gravity 66.2
Splatting 46.4
46% 57.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 353 374 414 412 412 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 454
Mixed 373
SusWrite 402
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 55.9
187% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 250
218% 324 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 117%
Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 297 297 297 297 297 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 459
Mixed 416
SusWrite 316
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 64.8
214% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 121%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 24 24 29 31 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.11% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 10.2
Mixed 3.2
SusWrite 26.6
8% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
44% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 8.11%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$14
60GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 68 69 66 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 62.2
Write 66.4
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 67.9
45% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.2% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 27" 1920 1017 AOC2790 G2790G4
Typical 9TE6EPL3Q6 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: 9te6epl3q6 9TE6EPL3Q6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $618
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback