Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 21 '24 at 13:03
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 191
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 598
56% 468 Pts
64-Core 776
48% 776 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Asus(1043 8660) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 566.03
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.7% Excellent
Lighting 81.5
Reflection 144
Parallax 145
66% 124 fps
MRender 159
Gravity 135
Splatting 113
108% 136 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 136 125 130 155 148 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 465
Mixed 378
SusWrite 147
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 46.4
150% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 342
257% 342 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
49GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 22 23 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
374% Outstanding
Read 4,096
Write 39.6
Mixed 78.4
SusWrite 22.4
220% 1,059 MB/s
4K Read 516
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 4.3
789% 174 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 374%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
71GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 142 137 129 160 157 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 368
Write 346
Mixed 363
SusWrite 147
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 48
158% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 336
254% 342 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 124%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
119GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 58 53 60 54 52 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 40GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.1% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 23.9
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 19.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 100 34" 1280 720 SAM0DC4 CF791
Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,469 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $664
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback