Today's hottest deals

MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C96
MotherboardMSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240308
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateNov 21 '24 at 07:24
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 78.1
1-Core 164
2-Core 324
100% 189 Pts
4-Core 639
8-Core 924
98% 782 Pts
64-Core 1,071
66% 1,071 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.9.1
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 21.2
Parallax 27.9
16% 23 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 23
Splatting 20.8
16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-wave Pro(P) 256G 256GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HS12805
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,983
Write 1,732
Mixed 1,412
380% 1,709 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 67.3
226% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 698
DQ Mixed 501
387% 515 MB/s
Poor: 154% Great: 276%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
287GB free
Firmware: JA0OA710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 86 84 85 84 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 74.7
Write 81.7
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 84.3
49% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GD2.1827CS.00D 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
78% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 25.9
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 27.8
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELF10F DELL SE2219HX
Typical A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96) Builds (Compare 2,188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback