Today's hottest deals

Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics99.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 21 '24 at 06:59
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 2600 How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 196
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 673
64% 532 Pts
64-Core 1,025
63% 1,025 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
PNY(196E 133C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.4% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 110
Parallax 124
98% 118 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 108
Splatting 101
102% 129 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$70
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 171 106 87 66 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 463
Write 378
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 124
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 3.4
56% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 99.5
DQ Mixed 170
136% 196 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 175 186 182 185 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 142
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 179
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
594GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 164 175 165 168 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 153
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 162
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 26.4
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 24.9
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 144 27" 1280 720 AOC2790 2790WG5
Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback