Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z270M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 day ago, 2 hrs ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z270M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '24 at 06:49
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$140
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 219
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 653
64% 527 Pts
64-Core 653
40% 653 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375D) 2GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 18.9
Parallax 18.7
15% 18.6 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 17.5
14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 4TB-$270
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2102 2161 2184 2178 2169 2164 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 2,305
Write 2,228
Mixed 2,050
SusWrite 2,160
493% 2,186 MB/s
4K Read 64.3
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 82.6
262% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 943
DQ Write 528
DQ Mixed 829
592% 767 MB/s
Poor: 303%
This bench: 339%
Great: 616%
Seagate SkyHawk 2TB (2016)-$75
2TB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 170 172 169 171 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 171
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 170
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate SkyHawk 3TB (2016)-$85
3TB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 172 176 174 171 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 163
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 173
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 104%
General UDisk 0GB
0GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9.7
Write 6.2
Mixed 7.2
9% 7.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4000 Series 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 25.8
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 28.6
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 31.5" 1920 1057 SAM0D34 C32F391
Typical Z270M Pro4 Builds (Compare 458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback