Today's hottest deals

AZW GTi14

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive329% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 hrs ago, 2 hrs ago.
SystemAZW GTi14  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW GTi14
Memory19.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '24 at 05:23
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 50.9
1-Core 190
2-Core 380
103% 207 Pts
4-Core 762
8-Core 1,276
124% 1,019 Pts
64-Core 1,951
121% 1,951 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics X8 (H-iGPU)
Intel(8086 2212) 2GB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 32.0.101.6078
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.5% Below average
Lighting 37
Reflection 26.1
Parallax 76.6
30% 46.6 fps
MRender 30.2
Gravity 53.5
Splatting 66.8
43% 50.2 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
845GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR413
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3661 2227 819 1558 562 328 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 2,059
Write 4,312
Mixed 2,647
SusWrite 1,526
599% 2,636 MB/s
4K Read 73.6
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 101
344% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,344
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 1,010
760% 1,032 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 329%
Great: 419%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CWMOD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
153% Outstanding
MC Read 62.4
MC Write 59.8
MC Mixed 60.5
174% 60.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 31.4
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 114%
This bench: 153%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM7706 LG HDR 4K
Typical GTi14 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 177%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 197%
UFO

System: AZW GTi14

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $501
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $378
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback