Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-P65

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 hrs ago, 2 hrs ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P65  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170905
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateNov 21 '24 at 05:03
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 157
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 423
43% 346 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 1650) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.34% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 6.7
5% 5.7 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 6
Splatting 9.9
6% 7.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.34%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$150
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 155 196 199 206 217 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 1,559
Write 672
Mixed 484
SusWrite 197
159% 728 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 38.3
137% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 684
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 345
280% 411 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 136%
Great: 243%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
274GB free
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 399 353 392 348 332 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 410
Mixed 402
SusWrite 357
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 36.1
117% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 340
255% 340 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD24D4S7D8MB-16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.9% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0P 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 8% 13 158 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15D7
Typical GA-P65 Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P65

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $378
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback