Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive300% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA  (all builds)
Memory121 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '24 at 04:58
Run Duration386 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 72.5
1-Core 129
2-Core 258
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 1,011
90% 759 Pts
64-Core 2,327
144% 2,327 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 566.03
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.2% Very good
Lighting 80.7
Reflection 55.2
Parallax 118
66% 84.5 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 129
Splatting 80.9
99% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$156
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2022 1744 1406 1414 1410 1433 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 1,949
Write 2,144
Mixed 2,107
SusWrite 1,572
439% 1,943 MB/s
4K Read 69.8
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 88.1
288% 96.2 MB/s
DQ Read 875
DQ Write 771
DQ Mixed 833
622% 826 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 300%
Great: 587%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$215
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 474 475 473 474 475 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 477
Mixed 449
SusWrite 473
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 45.3
148% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2293 2307 2309 1897 1529 1550 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
348% Outstanding
Read 2,523
Write 2,381
Mixed 1,924
SusWrite 1,981
495% 2,202 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 83.2
276% 97.2 MB/s
DQ Read 951
DQ Write 851
DQ Mixed 910
680% 904 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 348%
Great: 431%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
5.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5565 5660 5687 5670 5637 5626 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
680% Outstanding
Read 5,416
Write 5,793
Mixed 2,643
SusWrite 5,641
1,097% 4,873 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 81.4
262% 90.8 MB/s
DQ Read 889
DQ Write 799
DQ Mixed 847
634% 845 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 680%
Great: 372%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$175
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 161 159 159 163 163 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 124
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 161
84% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.7
315% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST14000DM001-2JC101 14TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 188 187 187 191 186 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 70% Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 128GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
175% Outstanding
MC Read 69.6
MC Write 72.1
MC Mixed 68.5
200% 70.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 41.6
SC Mixed 29.1
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 163%
This bench: 175%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 31 144 24" 1280 720 ACI24A4 VG248
Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,674
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $378
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback