Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B650M GAMING PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics95.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive528% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650M GAMING PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240814
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateNov 21 '24 at 04:43
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$179
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 78.4
1-Core 194
2-Core 337
108% 203 Pts
4-Core 766
8-Core 1,088
116% 927 Pts
64-Core 1,337
83% 1,337 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 110%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
Asus(1043 060D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.10.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.2% Outstanding
Lighting 60
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 503
49% 209 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 305
Splatting 275
185% 216 fps
Poor: 103%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 203%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN580 1TB
747GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 281010WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2371 3585 3589 3630 3612 3518 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
528% Outstanding
Read 3,818
Write 3,718
Mixed 2,684
SusWrite 3,384
765% 3,401 MB/s
4K Read 69.3
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 83.6
317% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 2,011
DQ Write 1,234
DQ Mixed 987
906% 1,411 MB/s
Poor: 238%
This bench: 528%
Great: 595%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown UD5-6000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
147% Outstanding
MC Read 53
MC Write 53.6
MC Mixed 51.6
151% 52.7 GB/s
SC Read 47.4
SC Write 54.9
SC Mixed 51.4
146% 51.2 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 147%
Great: 201%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0P 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 3% 61 208 56 180 27" 1280 720 MSI4CD3 G272QPF E2
Typical GA-B650M GAMING PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 245%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 249%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650M GAMING PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $1,028
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback