Today's hottest deals

HP Z1 TOWER G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Z1 TOWER G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8591
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240828
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 20 '24 at 13:07
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$223
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 80.2
1-Core 135
2-Core 270
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 982
91% 757 Pts
64-Core 998
62% 998 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 140
Parallax 144
104% 137 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 131
Splatting 116
99% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv1t02 KIOXIA 1TB
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,841
Write 1,253
Mixed 1,260
321% 1,451 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 59.5
193% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,102
DQ Write 979
DQ Mixed 1,004
763% 1,028 MB/s
Poor: 97% Great: 295%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
116GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 130
Write 92.1
Mixed 96.8
130% 106 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.1
152% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
89.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 28.2
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 27.2
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23" 1280 720 HWP3063 HP E231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback