Today's hottest deals

Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicrosoft Surface Laptop Studio 2  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Laptop Studio 2
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display2400 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '24 at 08:55
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
48% Average
Memory 39.7
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 186
54% 104 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 547
51% 424 Pts
64-Core 1,130
70% 1,130 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 48%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Microsoft(1414 0075) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5081
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 25
Parallax 19.6
20% 22.9 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 18.2
20% 25.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KBG50ZNS512G-KIOXIA 512GB
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ANMS0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 745 381 355 347 343 332 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 605
Write 532
Mixed 466
SusWrite 417
113% 505 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 23.7
73% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 558
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 474
331% 422 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 90%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G56BK7BX068 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
121% Outstanding
MC Read 46.9
MC Write 55
MC Mixed 47.8
143% 49.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 112%
This bench: 121%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 48 60 14.3" 1280 720 SHP1587 LQ144P1JX01
Typical Surface Laptop Studio 2 Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback