Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA  (all builds)
Memory120.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '24 at 03:32
Run Duration385 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 72.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 260
84% 155 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 1,020
89% 759 Pts
64-Core 2,356
146% 2,356 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 48.6
Parallax 87.5
114% 91.8 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 130
Splatting 70.6
87% 111 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$156
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2003 2021 1402 1422 1412 1394 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,586
Write 2,118
Mixed 2,018
SusWrite 1,609
467% 2,083 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 85.5
271% 91.6 MB/s
DQ Read 849
DQ Write 705
DQ Mixed 798
592% 784 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 321%
Great: 587%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$215
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 474 473 474 473 472 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 477
Mixed 460
SusWrite 474
108% 477 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 45.6
150% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 363
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2270 2278 2266 1907 1519 1506 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 2,524
Write 2,178
Mixed 1,897
SusWrite 1,958
481% 2,139 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 67.5
242% 83.9 MB/s
DQ Read 901
DQ Write 724
DQ Mixed 863
632% 830 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 331%
Great: 431%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
5.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5581 5666 5652 5670 5593 5535 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
683% Outstanding
Read 5,602
Write 5,931
Mixed 2,467
SusWrite 5,616
1,103% 4,904 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 77.6
257% 90.1 MB/s
DQ Read 875
DQ Write 760
DQ Mixed 866
636% 834 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 683%
Great: 372%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$175
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 164 165 163 163 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 128
Write 96.2
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 162
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.7
325% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST14000DM001-2JC101 14TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 188 188 189 189 187 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 70% Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 128GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
174% Outstanding
MC Read 70.5
MC Write 69.8
MC Mixed 68.4
199% 69.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 42
SC Mixed 28.1
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 163%
This bench: 174%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 45 144 24" 1280 720 ACI24A4 VG248
Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,674
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback