Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17K3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GE76 Raider 11UE
MotherboardMSI MS-17K3  (all builds)
Memory17.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220110
Uptime4 Days
Run DateNov 20 '24 at 02:12
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 54.1
1-Core 145
2-Core 281
83% 160 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 809
81% 657 Pts
64-Core 1,007
62% 1,007 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 1305) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9717
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 128
Parallax 120
111% 128 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 92.4
Splatting 79.6
80% 100 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green SN350 1TB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1474 1483 199 105 120 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,513
Write 1,443
Mixed 1,389
SusWrite 574
276% 1,230 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 71.6
246% 93.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,130
DQ Write 881
DQ Mixed 1,006
752% 1,006 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 217%
Great: 350%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-046.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
76.2% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 26.5
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 11.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 17.3" 1707 889 AUO978F
Typical MS-17K3 Builds (Compare 3,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-17K3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback