Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506ICB_FA506ICB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506ICB_FA506ICB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506ICB
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '24 at 16:41
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 70
2-Core 134
55% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 772
76% 621 Pts
64-Core 1,080
67% 1,080 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 16AD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.14
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.09% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 14.6
6% 10.1 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 20.2
Splatting 7.5
10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.09%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 111 135 94 234 219 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 775
Write 590
Mixed 586
SusWrite 204
120% 539 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 25.9
84% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 425
278% 330 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 24.9
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 19.3
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 0P 1R 2G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 41% 29 175 14 144 27" 1280 720 ACR0B39 ED270R S3
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506ICB_FA506ICB Builds (Compare 440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506ICB_FA506ICB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback