Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '24 at 16:04
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 74.4
1-Core 149
2-Core 294
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 983
94% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,494
92% 1,494 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 20.3
17% 19.5 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 16.5
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,273
Write 2,416
Mixed 2,007
499% 2,232 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 75.3
273% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 625
DQ Write 1,122
DQ Mixed 1,175
806% 974 MB/s
Poor: 154% Great: 390%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$120
2TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2431 2430 2432 2414 2427 2433 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
410% Outstanding
Read 2,538
Write 2,471
Mixed 2,356
SusWrite 2,428
552% 2,448 MB/s
4K Read 73.4
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 99.9
323% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,434
DQ Write 1,220
DQ Mixed 1,315
988% 1,323 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 410%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 31.1
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 32.5
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 77%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 23.8" 1280 720 AUS24CC VZ249
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 8,289 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $620
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback