Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory53.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 19 '24 at 14:13
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$160
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 830
80% 659 Pts
64-Core 1,052
65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$389
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 199
Parallax 218
173% 210 fps
MRender 304
Gravity 172
Splatting 128
156% 201 fps
Poor: 124%
This bench: 154%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$88
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 216 215 212 214 212 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,490
Write 1,156
Mixed 472
SusWrite 259
186% 844 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 43.1
166% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 914
DQ Write 639
DQ Mixed 678
533% 744 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 161%
Great: 236%
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
334GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 376 371 314 223 192 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 414
Write 228
Mixed 224
SusWrite 309
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 18.2
72% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 29.9
32% 56.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 102%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
3TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 193 194 192 193 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 199
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 193
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.8
210% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 109%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 43.1
MC Mixed 31.8
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 44.8
SC Mixed 29.3
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 100 28.8" 1280 720 GSM5BF8 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 11,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $375

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $902
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback