Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z87 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z87 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140121
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 19 '24 at 07:34
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 162
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 314
41% 311 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 566.14
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.5% Poor
Lighting 33.6
Reflection 41
Parallax 38.2
27% 37.6 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 38.9
Splatting 27.6
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 151 148 132 149 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 292
Write 250
Mixed 250
SusWrite 145
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 31.9
108% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 170
133% 182 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 85%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$140
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 152 151 150 152 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 136
Write 135
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 151
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$140
4.5TB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 152 150 152 152 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 151
Mixed 82
SusWrite 151
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$140
4.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 86 80 81 81 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 134
Write 112
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 82.6
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$140
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 155 155 158 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 123
Write 102
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 156
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$140
851GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 99 100 101 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 176
Write 151
Mixed 104
SusWrite 100
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$140
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 117 118 118 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 155
Write 130
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 118
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$140
765GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 96 97 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 108
Write 97
Mixed 70
SusWrite 96.7
68% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 125 124 123 124 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 119
Write 121
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 124
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 27
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 22.7
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 7 60 24" 1280 720 SAM0D92 S24D330
Typical Z87 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Extreme4 - $224

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $478
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback