Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive296% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA  (all builds)
Memory120.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '24 at 17:39
Run Duration386 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 72.7
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
83% 153 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 1,013
89% 758 Pts
64-Core 2,343
145% 2,343 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2340 MHz, MLim: 3809 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.7% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 128
Parallax 133
84% 122 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 116
Splatting 113
76% 89.3 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$156
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1956 1754 1424 1330 1386 1426 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 1,942
Write 2,130
Mixed 2,099
SusWrite 1,546
436% 1,929 MB/s
4K Read 66.3
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 89.5
284% 94.9 MB/s
DQ Read 867
DQ Write 728
DQ Mixed 818
607% 804 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 296%
Great: 587%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$215
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 470 473 469 469 473 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 474
Mixed 457
SusWrite 467
107% 473 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 46.2
150% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 363
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2298 2295 2273 1909 1543 1552 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 2,516
Write 2,349
Mixed 1,921
SusWrite 1,978
493% 2,191 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 81.8
270% 94.9 MB/s
DQ Read 958
DQ Write 818
DQ Mixed 897
670% 891 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 345%
Great: 431%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
5.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5611 5526 5379 5528 5514 5588 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
680% Outstanding
Read 5,685
Write 5,891
Mixed 2,412
SusWrite 5,524
1,096% 4,878 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 79.6
259% 89.7 MB/s
DQ Read 873
DQ Write 667
DQ Mixed 768
575% 769 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 680%
Great: 372%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$175
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 160 165 156 163 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 148
Write 130
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 159
82% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.6
312% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST14000DM001-2JC101 14TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 189 188 179 189 183 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 70% Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 128GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
172% Outstanding
MC Read 70.6
MC Write 67.2
MC Mixed 67.7
196% 68.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 28.6
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 163%
This bench: 172%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 31 144 24" 1280 720 ACI24A4 VG248
Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,674
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback