Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 18 '24 at 10:33
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 233
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 631
64% 520 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3486 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Lighting 97.5
Reflection 94.4
Parallax 88
80% 93.3 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 83
Splatting 75.1
73% 91.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3402101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 226 49 134 257 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 485
Write 308
Mixed 402
SusWrite 167
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 16.1
108% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 35.8
86% 175 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 102%
Intenso Sata III 256GB
118GB free
Firmware: 912XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 361 407 416 357 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 491
Write 433
Mixed 318
SusWrite 344
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 21.5
108% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 29.6
80% 162 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 95%
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
108GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 558 313 296 229 430 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 710
Write 656
Mixed 426
SusWrite 320
118% 528 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 60
192% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 768
DQ Write 524
DQ Mixed 348
340% 547 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 137%
Great: 277%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
72.7% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 22.1
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 24.6
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 34: 0P 3R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
34% 14% 100 215 58 60 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G3-
Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $930
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback