Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics63.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA  (all builds)
Memory118.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '24 at 06:38
Run Duration324 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 73.7
1-Core 128
2-Core 258
83% 153 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 944
85% 718 Pts
64-Core 2,341
145% 2,341 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 566.03
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63.6% Good
Lighting 76.8
Reflection 116
Parallax 123
63% 105 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 25.8
Splatting 82.6
65% 81 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$156
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1788 1801 1446 1316 1355 1309 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 1,925
Write 1,762
Mixed 1,933
SusWrite 1,502
401% 1,781 MB/s
4K Read 63.6
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 71.3
250% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 862
DQ Write 707
DQ Mixed 810
600% 793 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 281%
Great: 587%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$215
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 442 430 436 436 437 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 396
Mixed 444
SusWrite 435
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 39.2
133% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 363
271% 359 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2065 2039 2098 2026 1463 1605 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,515
Write 1,715
Mixed 1,748
SusWrite 1,883
440% 1,965 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 66.2
235% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 945
DQ Write 690
DQ Mixed 824
614% 820 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 324%
Great: 431%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
5.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5178 5180 5174 5217 5204 5138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
619% Outstanding
Read 4,676
Write 5,777
Mixed 2,551
SusWrite 5,182
1,026% 4,546 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 81.1
250% 88 MB/s
DQ Read 849
DQ Write 797
DQ Mixed 812
613% 820 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 619%
Great: 372%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$175
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 150 157 154 152 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 107
Write 98.9
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 155
70% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.8
337% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST14000DM001-2JC101 14TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 175 177 174 174 177 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 70% Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 128GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
165% Outstanding
MC Read 64.2
MC Write 66.5
MC Mixed 67.1
188% 65.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 40.2
SC Mixed 27.1
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 163%
This bench: 165%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 30 144 24" 1280 720 ACI24A4 VG248
Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,674
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback