Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA  (all builds)
Memory119.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '24 at 05:49
Run Duration325 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 73.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 248
82% 151 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 934
86% 719 Pts
64-Core 2,282
141% 2,282 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 566.03
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.7% Very good
Lighting 95.4
Reflection 68.6
Parallax 73.1
78% 79 fps
MRender 77.9
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 105
60% 69.4 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$156
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1775 1725 1336 1308 1320 1334 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,585
Write 1,596
Mixed 1,745
SusWrite 1,466
413% 1,848 MB/s
4K Read 69.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 88.7
278% 90.3 MB/s
DQ Read 867
DQ Write 649
DQ Mixed 749
562% 755 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 314%
Great: 587%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$215
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 431 434 443 436 434 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 438
Mixed 371
SusWrite 434
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 42.2
143% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 363
273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2113 2122 2165 1939 1451 1468 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 2,524
Write 1,952
Mixed 1,543
SusWrite 1,877
442% 1,974 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 83.8
275% 96.2 MB/s
DQ Read 912
DQ Write 648
317% 780 MB/s
Poor: 221% Great: 431%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
5.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5126 5128 5133 5175 5178 5117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
606% Outstanding
Read 4,591
Write 5,941
Mixed 2,399
SusWrite 5,143
1,020% 4,519 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 67.6
230% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 888
DQ Write 794
DQ Mixed 841
631% 841 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 606%
Great: 372%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$175
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 156 159 153 151 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 118
Write 103
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 155
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.8
332% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST14000DM001-2JC101 14TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 176 178 176 176 179 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 70% Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 CMW64GX4M4K3600C18 128GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
170% Outstanding
MC Read 68.9
MC Write 66.2
MC Mixed 68.2
194% 67.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 28.7
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 163%
This bench: 170%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 31 144 24" 1280 720 ACI24A4 VG248
Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,674
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback