Today's hottest deals

Asus P5KPL-AM SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM SE  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090911
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 16 '24 at 16:02
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5400-$75
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 31
2-Core 47.5
32% 46 Pts
4-Core 52.5
8-Core 52.4
7% 52.5 Pts
64-Core 59.2
4% 59.2 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Sapphire(174B E244) 1GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 27.7
15% 22.3 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 13.7
13% 16 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst Elite 480GB
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0714A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 157 171 160 153 165 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36% Below average
Read 204
Write 176
Mixed 165
SusWrite 162
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 12.6
52% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 78.6
DQ Mixed 26.8
28% 44.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 36%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.52% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.7
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.52%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 22 60 20.1" 1280 720 GSM563D M228WA
Typical P5KPL-AM SE Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback