Today's hottest deals

Computime CompuStation2016

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemComputime CompuStation2016  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q170M-C
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '24 at 10:48
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$90
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 219
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 438
58% 438 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78%
Great: 85%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 6
Parallax 7.5
5% 6.7 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
MSI(1462 3303) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2027 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.2% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 111
Parallax 101
85% 105 fps
MRender 92.4
Gravity 102
Splatting 97.8
80% 97.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$100
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 128 130 117 122 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 465
Mixed 290
SusWrite 150
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 48.8
167% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 293
233% 327 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 95%
Great: 110%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 367 374 373 352 375 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 374
Write 374
Mixed 344
SusWrite 367
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 28.6
92% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 107
92% 136 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 146 148 144 146 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 151
Write 147
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 146
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.3% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 20.4
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 20.5
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 72 22" 1920 1080 HWP26FA HP L2208w
Typical CompuStation2016 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Computime CompuStation2016

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $480
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback