Today's hottest deals

Asrock A520M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics245% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A520M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '24 at 08:52
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$130
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 81.3
1-Core 172
2-Core 343
105% 199 Pts
4-Core 665
8-Core 1,136
109% 900 Pts
64-Core 1,514
94% 1,514 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 103%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Asus(1043 89B0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 566.14
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
245% Outstanding
Lighting 359
Reflection 347
Parallax 357
293% 354 fps
MRender 465
Gravity 292
Splatting 229
257% 329 fps
Poor: 217%
This bench: 245%
Great: 267%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$110
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,885
Write 2,466
Mixed 2,329
501% 2,227 MB/s
4K Read 64.5
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 81.8
260% 85.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,255
DQ Write 890
DQ Mixed 1,114
821% 1,086 MB/s
Poor: 275% Great: 507%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C18D4/16GX 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 25 240 26.7" 2560 1440 GSM5C34 LG ULTRAGEAR+
Typical A520M-HDV Builds (Compare 804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback