Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire E5-774G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-774G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Hulk_SK
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime4 Days
Run DateNov 15 '24 at 16:28
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 145
58% 97.8 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 206
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 111A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 5.4
4% 4.33 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253256GB 256GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP2818E3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 289 342 308 342 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 376
Write 285
Mixed 300
SusWrite 272
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 8.2
52% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 13.7
69% 151 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.3% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 9.1
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 38 5 60 17.2" 1280 720 AUO119E
Typical Aspire E5-774G Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-774G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback