Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H270M-DS3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H270M-DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270M-DS3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170424
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 14 '24 at 20:06
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$35
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 164
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 236
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.2% Average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 82.7
Parallax 53.1
48% 64.8 fps
MRender 62.6
Gravity 52.3
Splatting 46.8
43% 53.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 22 23 23 22 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.3% Poor
Read 175
Write 28.4
Mixed 36
SusWrite 23.7
14% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 9.4
44% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 17
13% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$55
136GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 97 94 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 85.7
Mixed 61.4
SusWrite 95
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$18
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.6% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 201 56 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0D34 C32F391
Typical GA-H270M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-DS3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback