Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '24 at 16:39
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 78
1-Core 119
2-Core 228
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 725
70% 577 Pts
64-Core 930
58% 930 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.2% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 112
Parallax 115
84% 110 fps
MRender 95.7
Gravity 103
Splatting 99.5
82% 99.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 120GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 74 62 70 70 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 447
Write 351
Mixed 294
SusWrite 90.3
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 12.3
84% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 18.2
48% 100 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 85%
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
55GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 222 228 230 228 228 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.6% Below average
Read 264
Write 96.2
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 240
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 10.8
46% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 15.7
DQ Mixed 14.6
11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 100%
Kingston SNV2S500G 500GB
183GB free
Firmware: SBI02105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 988 1023 1021 1057 1060 621 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 2,174
Write 1,131
Mixed 1,221
SusWrite 962
305% 1,372 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 38.6
159% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 880
DQ Write 617
DQ Mixed 712
542% 736 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 227%
Great: 323%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3000 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 30.2
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 23.8
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 57 144 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $672
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback