Today's hottest deals

Dell XPS 8920

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 days ago, 1 day ago.
SystemDell XPS 8920  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0VHXCD
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '24 at 21:28
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 218
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 573
62% 495 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Dell(1028 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.8% Above average
Lighting 66.7
Reflection 70.4
Parallax 63.3
54% 66.8 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 67.5
Splatting 62
53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5KDA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 136
Write 396
Mixed 663
91% 398 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 28
104% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 560
DQ Write 396
DQ Mixed 400
320% 452 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 141%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$319
2.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 455 472 474 468 468 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 438
Mixed 394
SusWrite 439
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 38.9
126% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 352
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 102%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
2TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 183 185 186 185 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 125
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 185
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Amd-raid WDC WD40EZAZ-00Z 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 119 119 117 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 113
Write 112
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 118
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 1
1,144% 9.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
73% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 22.2
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 19.1
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ7F5F BenQ SW271
Typical XPS 8920 Builds (Compare 1,615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Dell XPS 8920

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback