Today's hottest deals

MSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D22
MotherboardMSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211110
Uptime19.1 Days
Run DateNov 13 '24 at 08:47
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 60.6
1-Core 111
2-Core 244
73% 139 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 649
59% 495 Pts
64-Core 662
41% 662 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gainward(10B0 1401) 2GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.7% Below average
Lighting 42.9
Reflection 45.6
Parallax 41
35% 43.2 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 41
Splatting 35.7
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 145 152 166 153 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 356
Write 222
Mixed 250
SusWrite 158
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 38.6
140% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 222
174% 241 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-2400C15-4GNT 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
36% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 8.3
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 27" 1280 720 LEN66B8 D27-30
Typical H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22) Builds (Compare 8,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $379
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback