Today's hottest deals

HP Elite 7100 Microtower PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Elite 7100 Microtower PC  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9Ch
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100625
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 12 '24 at 18:57
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$40
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 140
55% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 189
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 475.14
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.9 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 235 237 244 243 239 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.9% Above average
Read 107
Write 57.7
Mixed 36
SusWrite 239
25% 110 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 29.1
77% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 151
122% 171 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
128GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 95 95 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 92.3
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 93.6
65% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99P5471-004.A01LF 0B830B83 M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.3% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.9
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 21 60 22" 1280 720 ACR0009 Acer X223W
Typical Elite 7100 Microtower PC Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Elite 7100 Microtower PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback