Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics70.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-E R2.0/BR  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 12 '24 at 00:31
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 113
2-Core 212
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 344
36% 292 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
Nvidia(10DE 21C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.3% Very good
Lighting 86.8
Reflection 87.7
Parallax 90.9
71% 88.5 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 76.5
Splatting 70.8
69% 87.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 2.1 4.7 5.4 5.4 255 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 497
Write 276
Mixed 400
SusWrite 46.1
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 21.7
101% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 0.2
64% 148 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HKED4161CAB2F1HB2 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
39.2% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 12.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 11.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 0P 5R 7G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 54% 39 207 58 60 0" 1280 720 DELL E1916H
Typical PRIME H310M-E R2.0/BR Builds (Compare 993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $260
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback