Today's hottest deals

Asrock H81M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H81M  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180312
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 10 '24 at 16:51
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 95
2-Core 184
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 352
46% 345 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 134
Parallax 122
99% 126 fps
MRender 94.2
Gravity 127
Splatting 114
92% 112 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 389 421 416 432 434 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 432
Mixed 421
SusWrite 411
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 45.6
146% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 292
239% 341 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 106%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
357GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 157 155 156 157 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 124
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 154
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 112%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 16 14 14 11 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 65.3
Write 1.5
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 13.7
25% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
14% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
31.4% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23" 1280 720 AOC2369 2369M
Typical H81M Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback