Today's hottest deals

Microelectronics G316

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicroelectronics G316  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock Z390 Pro4
Memory6.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210120
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 10 '24 at 16:38
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 90
1-Core 133
2-Core 257
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 607
72% 556 Pts
64-Core 760
47% 760 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Zotac(19DA 4511) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.8% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 108
Parallax 135
97% 120 fps
MRender 167
Gravity 120
Splatting 102
103% 130 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 422 414 309 150 202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 467
Write 416
Mixed 406
SusWrite 320
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 28.6
97% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 272
226% 326 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 121%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
39GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 138 134 125 133 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 173
Write 163
Mixed 108
SusWrite 136
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD480E82-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
69.7% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 22
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 22.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 0P 2R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 12% 81 208 44 120 72.3" 1707 937 GSM81C5 LG TV SSCR2
Typical G316 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

System: Microelectronics G316

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback